Legal Opinion
Engleson v. Port Crescent Shingle Co.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1913No. 11206PublishedCited by 16 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Humphries, J., entered March 7, 1913, upon the verdiet of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
— In this action the respondent recovered against the appellant for services rendered in the sale of certain timber owned by the appellant; a part of such timber being upon lands owned by the appellant, and a part thereof on lands of third persons who had sold the timber on such lands to the appellant. The contract on which the recovery was had is set forth in the complaint in the following language :
“(2) That on or about the forepart of the month of January, 1912, defendants came to said Black Cat Employment Co. and orally informed said company that it, said defendant, had a large quantity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Keith v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Forland v. BoyumWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Seymour v. LaFurgeyWashington Supreme Court · 1907
- Thill v. JohnstonWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Foote v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court · 1908
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Rayonier, Incorporated v. F. Arnold PolsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
- Cushing v. Monarch Timber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
- Grammer v. Skagit Valley Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
- France v. Deep River Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1914
- Goodrich v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1913
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.