Legal Opinion

Meritor Savings Bank v. Camelback Canyon Investors

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided April 27, 1992No. CIV 91-843 PHX WPCPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

COPPLE, District Judge.

Several months ago defendants William and Suzanne Chick (“Chick”) filed a motion for partial summary judgment on the grounds that Mrs. Chick did not join in the Camelback Canyon Investors’ (“CCI”) loan transaction with Meritor Savings Bank (“Meritor”). On November 8, 1991 this Court ruled that the plain language of A.R.S. § 25-214(C)(l) required joinder of both spouses in order to encumber interests in real property in Arizona. The Court then granted the Chick’s motion for partial summary judgment holding that in the absence of Mrs. Chick’s joinder…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company v. Charles E. LawrensonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1964
  2. Colorado National Bank v. MerlinoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1983
  3. Bank of Hoven v. RauschSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Morrow v. ToppingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  5. Klaas v. HaueterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Chase Bank of Arizona v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  2. Chase Bank of Arizona v. AcostaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994
  3. SiteLock LLC v. GoDaddy.com LLCDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API