Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta

OPINION

JACOBSON, Presiding Judge.

The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the plaintiff bank foreclosing a real property mortgage given by a limited partnership and granting a deficiency judgment against appellants, Joe and Aurora Acosta. Appellants, a general partner in the limited partnership and his wife (hereafter, *565collectively “Acosta”), appeal from the deficiency judgment entered against them. The bank cross-appeals from the court’s award of its attorneys’ fees in an amount less than requested.

FACTS

We view the facts in the light most favorable to appellants, the parties…