Legal Opinion
Klaas v. Haueter
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 19, 1987No. 7804-3-IIIPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcInturff, C.J.
Mr. Klaas obtained a judgment against Roy Haueter individually, but not against the community, for a real estate commission under an exclusive listing agreement. Mr. Klaas appeals claiming a basis for community liability exists. We disagree and affirm.
Because Roy and Billee Haueter's apartment building was operating at a loss, they decided to sell it. Mrs. Haueter had given Mr. Haueter her power of attorney. She stated the purpose of giving him the power of attorney was "strictly for convenience sake, because with our six children it wasn't always practical for me to come down to the office,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- State Ex Rel. MacRi v. City of BremertonWashington Supreme Court · 1941
- Group Health Cooperative of Puget Sound, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Herzog Aluminum, Inc. v. General American Window Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1984
- Nichols Hills Bank v. McCoolWashington Supreme Court · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of LutzCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
- Woodcraft Construction, Inc. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- Grayson v. PlatisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- G.W. Equipment Leasing, Inc. v. Mt. McKinley Fence Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Meritor Savings Bank v. Camelback Canyon InvestorsDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.