Legal Opinion

Colorado National Bank v. Merlino

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided August 29, 1983No. 9930-2-IPublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtScholfield, J.

The Colorado National Bank of Denver (the Bank) appeals an order holding Gary M. Merlino separately liable for a judgment entered in favor of the Bank and declaring the assets of the Merlino marital community not subject to execution in satisfaction of the judgment. Gary and Donna Merlino move to dismiss the appeal, alleging the Bank failed to timely file a notice of appeal. We hold the notice of appeal was timely and affirm the judgment.

Gary and Donna Merlino are married residents of the state of Washington, having resided in Seattle throughout their marriage. All property owned by both Gary…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Johnson v. MuelbergerSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Bumpus v. Uniroyal Tire Co., Div. of Uniroyal, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Reynolds v. City of DaytonDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1982
  4. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  5. deElche v. JacobsenWashington Supreme Court · 1980

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Geronimo Hotel & Lodge v. PutziArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  2. City of Kennewick v. VandergriffWashington Supreme Court · 1987
  3. First Community Bank v. Maureen GaughanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Idaho Department of Health v. HoljesonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
  5. Merlino v. Weinstein (In Re Merlino)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Washington · 1986

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API