Legal Opinion
Chase Bank of Arizona v. Acosta
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 3, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 91-0093Published
1Opinion of the Court
179 Ariz. 563 (1994)
880 P.2d 1109
CHASE BANK OF ARIZONA, an Arizona corporation, successor to Continental Bank, Plaintiff, Counterdefendant-Appellee, Cross-Appellant,
v.
Joe ACOSTA and Aurora Acosta, husband and wife, Defendants, Counterclaimants-Appellants, Cross-Appellees.
No. 1 CA-CV 91-0093.
Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department B.
February 3, 1994.
Review Granted and Denied October 4, 1994.
Streich Lang, P.A. by William S. Hawgood, II, Timothy Thomason and Leigh Lani Brown, Phoenix, for plaintiff, counterdefendant-appellee, cross-appellant.
Stewart & McLean, Ltd. by Harry A.…
Also in this document: Concurrence; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. WarnerArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Schweiger v. China Doll Restaurant, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- Gordinier v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.