Legal Opinion

Nash v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided December 11, 1950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

IRVING R. KAUFMAN, District Judge.

Plaintiff, a consultant in the business of product development and industrial design, seeks to recover from the defendant reasonable compensation for services rendered to the defendant and also damages for common-law copyright infringement. The facts are as follows:

Defendant is an airline company incorporated in Alaska and engaged in the business of transportation of passengers and freight by air’ in Alaska and elsewhere. In a revitalization of its advertising program, defendant retained Fred W. Burnside in September, 194S at $200 per month to handle its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
  2. Moore v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1928

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Read v. TurnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  3. Smith v. Little, Brown & CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
  4. Bell v. Pro Arts, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1973
  5. Judd v. HeitmanDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API