Legal Opinion
Ansehl v. Puritan Pharmaceutical Co.
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided September 7, 1932No. 9403PublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, Circuit Judge.
The appellant was plaintiff in the court below, and the appellees were defendants, and they will be so referred to in this opinion. The plaintiff* brought suit against the defendants, alleging the infringement of a copyright covering advertising matter, and asking for an injunction and an accounting. The complaint alleged that the plaintiff was a dealer in cosmetic and toilet articles bearing the trade-name “Vivani”; that, to promote the sale of these articles, he prepared a distinctive advertisement composed of a photograph and of reading and descriptive matter, which…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Bleistein v. Donaldson Lithographing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Burrow-Giles Lithographic Co. v. SaronySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Callaghan v. MyersSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
- L. A. Westermann Co. v. Dispatch Printing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Universal Pictures Co. v. Harold Lloyd CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1947
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. LangerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Lin-Brook Builders Hardware v. Evelyn Gertler and Irving Gertler, Individually, and Dba All-American Home CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1965
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.