Legal Opinion
Bell v. Pro Arts, Inc.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided October 2, 1973No. C 71-661PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
BATTISTI, Chief Judge.
This is an action seeking injunctive relief and damages pursuant to 17 U.S. C. § 101 for alleged copyright infringements. The case came on for trial before this Court on August 13, 1973, jury having been waived by the parties. In accordance with Rule 52(a), F.R.Civ.P., the Court makes the following findings of facts and conclusions of law.
FINDINGS OF'FACT
A. The Parties
1. Plaintiff Bell, dba Crescendo Publishers, is a citizen of Massachusetts, having his principal place of business in the City of Boston. He is engaged in the business of book…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Shapiro, Bernstein & Co., Inc. v. H. L. Green Company, Inc., and Third Party Jalen Amusement Company, Inc., and Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- City Loan & Savings Co. v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1964
- United States v. FlandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Nash v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Kamakazi Music Corp. v. Robbins Music Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1982
- Bell v. Combined Registry CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1975
- Nintendo of America, Inc. v. Elcon Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1982
- Curcio Webb LLC v. National Benefit Programs Agency, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2005
- Robert L. Bell, D/B/A Crescendo Publishers, and Cuarta Corporation, D/B/A Crescendo Publishing Company v. Pro Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975