Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane Company
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BROWNING, Circuit Judge.
Appellant, an employee of Boeing Airplane Company, brought this action to recover compensation for the use of an idea he had submitted for improvement of Boeing’s production methods. 1 The District Court granted Boeing’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse, finding material factual issues to be tried.
The parties had agreed to a pretrial order, which, under the heading “Admitted Facts,” described a “Suggestion System” through which Boeing solicited and paid for useful ideas. The pretrial order stated that appellant had submitted his idea to Boeing in December 1955…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
- Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
- Sandeman v. SayresWashington Supreme Court · 1957
- Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
- State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- United States v. First National Bank of CircleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
- Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Jack Meyers v. The Selznick Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.