Legal Opinion

Orin Osborn v. Boeing Airplane Company

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 11, 1962No. 17391_1PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROWNING, Circuit Judge.

Appellant, an employee of Boeing Airplane Company, brought this action to recover compensation for the use of an idea he had submitted for improvement of Boeing’s production methods. 1 The District Court granted Boeing’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse, finding material factual issues to be tried.

The parties had agreed to a pretrial order, which, under the heading “Admitted Facts,” described a “Suggestion System” through which Boeing solicited and paid for useful ideas. The pretrial order stated that appellant had submitted his idea to Boeing in December 1955…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Spooner v. Reserve Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  3. Sandeman v. SayresWashington Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Winslow v. MellWashington Supreme Court · 1956
  5. State Bank of Wilbur v. PhillipsWashington Supreme Court · 1941

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Henry S. Bloomgarden v. Charles B. CoyerCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
  2. United States v. First National Bank of CircleCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
  3. Murdock-Bryant Construction, Inc. v. PearsonArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
  5. Jack Meyers v. The Selznick Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API