Legal Opinion

Judd v. Heitman

District Court, M.D. Tennessee

Decided October 14, 1975No. Civ. A. 74-246PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.

The above-styled cause was heard by the Court without a jury and taken under submission on the 15th day of September 1975. Having considered the testimony, exhibits, stipulations and arguments of counsel, the Court makes the following findings of fact and conclusions of law:

FINDINGS OF FACT

I. This action was brought by the plaintiff, Thomas E. Judd, a citizen of Salt Lake City, Utah, for the balance due and owing the plaintiff under the terms of an installment sale and security agreement entered into with the defendants, Ralph E. Heitman and Mary E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. Nash v. Alaska Airlines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1950

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. V. L. Nicholson Co. v. Transcon Investment & Financial Ltd.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Parker v. Department of Health, Education, & WelfareDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1979
  3. In Re W.F. Martin Co.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1986
  4. Isbell v. Travis Electric Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2000
  5. Lieber v. Union Carbide Corp., Nuclear Div.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API