Legal Opinion

State v. Graham

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 22, 1993No. 92C20046; CA A75449PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDurham, J.

Defendant pleaded guilty to two counts of burglary in the first degree. ORS 164.225. He appeals from concurrent sentences of 60 months in prison, imposed pursuant to ORS 137.635. 1 He argues that the court erred in failing to sentence him according to sentencing guidelines. The state concedes that, under State v. Haydon, 116 Or App 347, 842 P2d 410 (1992), the court did not have the authority under ORS 137.635(1) to impose a sentence that is longer than that authorized by the guidelines.

We first address whether the sentence resulted from a plea agreement. If so, we may not review it. ORS…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. AdamsOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. HaydonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  3. State v. DvorakCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. State v. GouveiaCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. CarrCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  2. State v. FranksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  3. State v. AllisonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API