Legal Opinion

State v. Franks

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided September 11, 1996No. C9504-32897; CA A90102PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him of two counts of burglary in the first degree, ORS 164.225, and one count of robbery in the third degree, ORS 164.395. We affirm defendant’s convictions but remand for resentencing.

Defendant first assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion, made at the beginning of his trial, to obtain substitute counsel. We affirm the trial court’s denial of that motion without discussion.

Defendant also assigns error to the court’s imposition of a 36-month term of incarceration on the second count of his burglary conviction. Defendant was charged…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  2. State v. GrahamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  3. State v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API