Legal Opinion
State v. Haydon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided November 12, 1992No. 90C-21630; CA A69008PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDe Muniz, J.
Treating the state’s petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, we allow it, withdraw our former opinion and remand for resentencing.
Defendant challenged the sentences for his convictions for robbery and burglary imposed under ORS 137.635, the codification of Ballot Measure 4, adopted by the voters in 1988, which provides, in part:
“(1) When, in the case of a felony described in subsection (2) of this section, a court sentences a convicted defendant who has previously been convicted of any felony designated in subsection (2) of this section, the sentence shall not be an indeterminate…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. MoellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- State v. MoellerOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- Anthony v. VeatchOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- Davis v. Wasco Intermediate Education DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- 1000 Friends of Oregon v. Wasco County CourtOregon Supreme Court · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. LyonsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. MorganCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- State v. LittleCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Curry v. GrillCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.