Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Henderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1965PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLusk, J.

This is a proceeding under the “Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act,” ORS 28.010-28.160, brought by a duly licensed dentist to obtain a judicial declaration that certain regulations of advertising by dentists adopted and promulgated by the defendant, Oregon State Board of Dental Examiners, are invalid. The defendant, in its answer, joined in the request for a declaration, and the court entered a decree sustaining some of the regulations and holding others invalid. Both sides have appealed.

*77The regulations were adopted by the board on November 2, 1962, and purport to be interpretations of OKS…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Recall Bennett Committee v. BennettOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Witschner v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Megdal v. Oregon State Board of Dental ExaminersOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Brooks v. DierkerOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Gortmaker v. SeatonOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Gast v. State, by and Through StevensonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  5. Pyle v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API