Legal Opinion

Gast v. State, by and Through Stevenson

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided October 2, 1978No. A7710-14092, CA 9686PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, P. J.

Plaintiff brought this suit for a declaratory judgment praying for a declaration of rights and duties under Oregon Laws 1977, ch 330, amending ORS 659.030. 1 Chapter 330 provides::Jc :js

"SECTION 1. Section 2 of this Act is added to and made a part of ORS 659.010 to 659.110.
"SECTION 2. For purposes of ORS 659.030, the phrase 1)6031186 of sex’ includes, but is not limited to, because of pregnancy, childbirth and related medical conditions or occurrences. Women affected by pregnancy, childbirth or related medical conditions or occurrences shall be treated the same for all employment-related…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Ex Parte YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Geduldig v. AielloSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Alessi v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Lukus v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  3. State v. ScharfOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Electrical Workers, Local No. 1 Credit Union v. IBEW-NECA Holiday Trust FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 1979
  5. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co. v. State Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API