Witschner v. City of Atchison
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
*213The opinion of the court was delivered by
Wedell, J.:
This action purports to have been commenced pursuant to our declaratory judgment law (Laws 1921, ch. 168) to obtain an adjudication of the question whether a certain automatically operated pin ball marble amusement table constituted a gambling device under the laws of this state and the ordinances of the city of Atchison.
The action was instituted by the owner of the machine. Defendants are the city of Atchison and its chief of police. It was the judgment of the trial court the machine did not constitute a gambling device by reason of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Reed v. LittletonNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- International Mutoscope Reel Co., Inc. v. ValentineNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Worden v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Earhart v. YoungTennessee Supreme Court · 1939
3Cited by12 opinions
- California Water & Telephone Co. v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Cady v. CadySupreme Court of Kansas · 1978
- Gray v. DefaUtah Supreme Court · 1943
- Campbell v. HendersonOregon Supreme Court · 1965
- Boeing Airplane Co. v. Board of County CommissionersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.