Harris & Hull, Inc. v. McCarty-Vaughan-Evans Corp.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtFinch, P. J.
This is an action for specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale to the plaintiff of a number of lots in Los Angeles County. The defendants were given judgment for costs and the plaintiff has appealed.
The alleged contract is attached to the complaint and made a part thereof. The lots are therein described by reference to an unrecorded map, which the contract recites is not recorded. It is signed on the part of the seller as follows: “MeCarty-Vaughan-Bvans Corporation, Sellers, Fred T. Linstrum.” The prayer of the complaint is for judgment “for specific performance of said…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Zellner v. WassmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Smith v. BachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- Shortell v. Evans-Ferguson Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Von Schrader v. MiltonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Masero v. BessoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Johnson v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Martin v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
- Longway v. NewberyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Harrison v. United Farm AgencySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1953
- Short v. Marcus CA2/2California Court of Appeal · 2014