Legal Opinion

Weiss v. Public Utilities Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2000No. 99-444PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.

This appeal concerns the reasonableness and legality of rates charged by CEI for electric service rendered to customers at different locations within its service territory.

*16In 1992, CEI sought commission approval of its Competitive Pilot Program, which would permit it to enter into “competitive response contracts” for service to eligible customers at discounts from its tariffed rates, and other benefits that were not available to its tariff customers. To be eligible for this program, a customer had to be a commercial or industrial customer with a demand between one hundred fifty kW and five…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Herman v. KlopfleischOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Purdy v. Clermont County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Duff v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1978
  5. Collinsworth v. Western Electric Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1992

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Davis v. Public Employees Retirement BoardOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
  4. State ex rel. Canales-Flores v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ohio Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API