Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Doersam v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 23, 1989No. 88-51PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDouglas, J.

The issue before us is whether R.C. 4123.59(B), as amended by Am. Sub. H.B. No. 714, effective January 1, 1976, is constitutional or is unconstitutional in whole or in part.

R.C. 4123.59(B) provides for death benefits to wholly dependent persons of a decedent whose death is caused by a work-connected injury or occupational disease. The pertinent provisions of R.C. 4123.59(B) are:

“In case an injury to or an occupational disease contracted by an employee causes his death, benefits shall be in the amount and to the persons following:

* *

“(B) If there are wholly dependent persons at the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Yick Wo v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Barbier v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Hayes v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. State ex rel. Nyitray v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  5. State ex rel. King v. RhodesOhio Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. Mole (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State v. Noling (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Weiss v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Roseman v. Firemen & Policemen's Death Benefit FundOhio Supreme Court · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API