Legal Opinion

Petzold v. Borman’s, Inc

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided September 19, 2000No. Docket 211567PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, P.J.

Defendants, Borman’s, Inc., doing business as Farmer Jack, 1 and Gary Chapell, appeal by leave granted the trial court’s denial of their motion for summary disposition in this action under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (HCRA), now known as the Persons with Disabilities Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.1101 et seq.-, MSA 3.550(101) et seq. We reverse.

The relevant facts in this case are largely undisputed. Plaintiff, Karl Petzold, suffers from a rare neurological disorder known as Tourette Syndrome (TS). He has had TS since he was seven years old. In order to understand the events in this case, it…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Spiek v. Department of TransportationMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Chmielewski v. Xermac, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Rourk v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Allen v. Southeastern Michigan Transportation AuthorityMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Collins v. Blue Cross Blue ShieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1998

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bachman v. Swan Harbour AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Ray v. Kroger Co.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2003
  3. Bertrand v. City of MacKinac IslandMichigan Court of Appeals · 2003
  4. Estate of Thornton Jackson Jr v. 36th District CourtMichigan Court of Appeals · 2019
  5. Jay Pemberton v. Bell's Brewery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API