Legal Opinion

Rourk v. Oakwood Hospital Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1998No. 104997, Calendar No. 2PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*27Weaver, J.

We granted leave in this case to determine whether an employer’s duty to accommodate a handicapped employee includes the duty to transfer that employee to a different job or position under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (HCRA), MCL 37.1101 et seq.-, MSA 3.550(101) et seq. We hold that it does not and, therefore, affirm the Court of Appeals affirmance of the trial court’s grant of summary disposition for defendant.

i

Plaintiff Rourk was employed by defendant hospital as a registered nurse. On June 16, 1990, she suffered a shoulder injury in a nonwork related automobile accident.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodman v. RunyonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  2. Wimbley v. BolgerDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1986
  3. Carr v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Rancour v. Detroit Edison Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Wardlow v. Great Lakes Express Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Peden v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bachman v. Swan Harbour AssociatesMichigan Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. Lamoria v. Health Care & Retirement Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Petzold v. Borman’s, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2000
  5. Calvin v. Ford Motor Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API