Legal Opinion
Ray v. Kroger Co.
District Court, S.D. Georgia
Decided May 27, 2003No. CV 402-019PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
NANGLE, District Judge.
Plaintiff, who suffers from Tourette’s Syndrome, alleges that Kroger terminated his employment in violation of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq., (the “ADA”). Before the Court is defendant Kroger’s motion for summary judgment (Doc. 18). For the reasons stated herein, such motion (Doc. 18) is hereby GRANTED.
SUMMARY JUDGMENT STANDARD
Summary judgment serves to “pierce the pleadings and to assess the proof in order to see whether there is a genuine need for trial.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 advisory committee’s note, cited in Matsushita Elec.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Combs v. Plantation PatternsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Mikele S. CARTER, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. CITY OF MIAMI, Jose Garcia-Pendrosa, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bell v. GonzalesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
- Caporicci v. Chipotle Mexican Grill, Inc.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Walgreen Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
- Marshall v. EyeCare SpecialtiesNebraska Supreme Court · 2016
- Price v. Facility Management Group, Inc.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.