Legal Opinion

Charles v. Principi

United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims

Decided October 3, 2002No. 01-1536PublishedCited by 82 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAMER, Chief Judge:

The appellant appeals, through counsel, an August 7, 2001, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) that determined that new and material evidence had not been submitted to reopen his claim for service connection for right-ear hearing loss and that denied his claim for service connection for tinnitus. Record (R.) at 3, 6, 7. The appellant and the Secretary have filed briefs. This appeal is timely, and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. §§ 7252(a) and 7266(a). For the reasons that follow, the Court will vacate the Board’s decision and remand…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
  2. Kutscherousky v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
  3. Caluza v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995
  4. Fletcher v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1991
  5. Allday v. BrownUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by82 opinions

  1. Larry A. Pelegrini v. Anthony J. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2004
  2. James P. Barr v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
  3. McLendon v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
  4. Rick K. Kahana v. Eric K. ShinsekiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2011
  5. L IZZIE K. M AY FIELD v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2005

77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API