Caluza v. Brown
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims
1Opinion of the Court
STEINBERG, Associate Judge:
The appellant, Mario G. Caluza, appeals a February 25, 1993, Board of Veterans’ Appeals (Board or BVA) decision denying service connection for residuals of a shell-fragment wound (SFW) to his right leg. The appellant filed an informal brief, and the Secretary filed a brief. For the reasons that follow, the Court affirms the Board decision.
I. Background
The pro se appellant, World War II veteran Mario G. Caluza, had qualifying active-duty service (missing status and recognized guerilla service) in the Philippine Army from November 1944 to November 1945. Record (R.) at…
2Cases cited81 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1990
- Kokoszka v. BelfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Philbrook v. GlodgettSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Ryan Burns, by His Mother and Next Friend, Donna Burns v. Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by423 opinions
- Dingess - Hartman v. NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2006
- James P. Barr v. R. James NicholsonUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2007
- Kay v. PrincipiUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002
- Fenderson v. WestUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999
- Jerry R. Shedden, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
418 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.