Legal Opinion
Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 8, 1941No. Civil 1119PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.
There is one question presented to the Court for its consideration, that is, whether or not plaintiff at the time of the accident, in which he sustained injuries, was engaged in interstate commerce.
The parties have entered into a written stipulation of all the facts, as follows:
“1. The Pennsylvania Railroad Company is and was at the times complained of a common carrier by railroad, at least two-thirds of whose business is in interstate commerce.
“2. From November 1, 1939 to and including January 12, 1940, plaintiff was a brakeman in defendant’s employ as a member of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. RigsbySupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Illinois Central Railroad v. BehrensSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- Southern Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Griffith v. GardnerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Maxie v. Gulf Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1947
- Maxie v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Agostino v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1943
- Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.