Legal Opinion

Maxie v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided March 14, 1949No. 40768PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[333]

DOUGLAS, P. J.

This is a second appeal by the railroad in a suit for personal injuries under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. ■ At the first trial the case was submitted to the jury under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, and the jury gave plaintiff judgment for $17,000. Upon appeal, we reversed and remanded on the ground submission under .the .res ipsa loquitur doctrine was error since the petition had pleaded acts of specific negligence on- the part of the railroad. Our opinion, is .reported in 356 Mo. 633, 202 S. W. (2d) 904.

After remand plaintiff amended his petition to plead…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
  3. Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gordon v. Muehling Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
  5. Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
  2. Layton v. PalmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  3. Shafer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  4. Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
  5. Parlow v. Dan Hamm Drayage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API