Maxie v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
[333]
DOUGLAS, P. J.
This is a second appeal by the railroad in a suit for personal injuries under the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. ■ At the first trial the case was submitted to the jury under the res ipsa loquitur doctrine, and the jury gave plaintiff judgment for $17,000. Upon appeal, we reversed and remanded on the ground submission under .the .res ipsa loquitur doctrine was error since the petition had pleaded acts of specific negligence on- the part of the railroad. Our opinion, is .reported in 356 Mo. 633, 202 S. W. (2d) 904.
After remand plaintiff amended his petition to plead…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Shanks v. Delaware, Lackawanna & Western RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile Ohio Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- Southern Pacific Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Gordon v. Muehling Packing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1931
- Ermin v. Pennsylvania R. Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1941
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Cruce v. Gulf, Mobile & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1951
- Layton v. PalmerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Shafer v. Southwestern Bell Telephone CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
- Adam Hat Stores, Inc. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Parlow v. Dan Hamm Drayage Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1965
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.