Legal Opinion

Agostino v. Pennsylvania R. Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 2, 1943No. 2996PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

These are two motions; one, by the defendant to dismiss the complaint, and the other, by the plaintiff for an order striking from defendant’s answer the fifth defense and so much of the first defense as denies the allegations contained in paragraph “IV” of the complaint.

Paragraph “IV” of the complaint is as follows: “At the time and place plaintiff was injured, as hereinafter described, he was in the employ of the defendant, and both plaintiff and defendant were engaged in interstate transportation, and at said time and place, all or part of plaintiff’s duties, as…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. DarbySupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  2. Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. A. B. Kirschbaum Co. v. WallingSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Walling v. Jacksonville Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Overstreet v. North Shore Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. GileoSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. Atlantic Coast Line R. R. v. MeeksCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1947
  3. Pritt v. W.V.N.R.R.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Albright v. Pennsylvania R.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1944
  5. Armstrong v. Missouri-Kansas-Texas R. Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1950

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API