Legal Opinion

Fearing v. Westcott

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 13, 1973No. 731SC219PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

The only question presented is whether the court erred in granting defendant’s motion to dismiss.

Plaintiff first argues that there was evidence to support a finding that defendant breached a duty owed to plaintiff. A patron at a Bingo parlor is an invitee to whom the proprietor owes a duty to exercise ordinary care to keep his premises in a reasonably safe condition and the proprietor is not an insurer of the safety of his patrons. Graves v. Order of Elks, 268 N.C. 356, 150 S.E. 2d 522. It is a question of law for the court whether there is sufficient evidence to support a…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Helms v. ReaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
  2. Bryant v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  3. Bryant v. KellyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1971
  4. Lane v. DorneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Graves v. Charlotte Lodge No. 392 Benevolent & Protective Order of ElksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carter v. FosterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1991
  2. Hobson Const. Co., Inc. v. Hajoca Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  3. Williams v. LilesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976
  4. Cantey v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API