Legal Opinion

Newsom v. Byrnes

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1994No. 9319SC337PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Chief Judge.

Plaintiffs’ only assignment of error is that the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendant. Plaintiffs maintain that there was sufficient evidence of defendant’s negligence and sufficient evidence on the lack of plaintiff’s contributory negligence to submit to the jury. We disagree.

Plaintiffs were invitees in the case at bar because their purpose for entering defendant’s property was to purchase the camper. Rappaport v. Days Inn, 296 N.C. 382, 250 S.E.2d 245 (1979). Under North Carolina law, as owner of the premises, defendant owed to plaintiffs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Pulley v. Rex HospitalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  2. Rappaport v. Days Inn of America, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Norwood v. Sherwin-Williams Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. Lamm v. Bissette Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1990
  5. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Hoisington v. ZT-Winston-Salem AssociatesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  2. Nelson v. Novant Health Triad Region, L.L.C.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2003
  3. Wolfley v. Solectron USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. Croker v. Yadkin, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Finney v. Rose's Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API