Legal Opinion

Samuel v. Simmons

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1981No. 8017SC550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

The sole question presented on appeal is whether the trial court properly granted the defendants’ motion for a directed verdict at the close of plaintiff’s evidence.

The motion by defendants for directed verdict raises the ques tion of whether, as a matter of law, the evidence offered by the plaintiff, when presented in the light most favorable to the plaintiff, is sufficient to be submitted to the jury. Roberts v. Memorial Park, 281 N. C. 48, 187 S. E. 2d 721 (1972). Every reasonable inference which can be drawn from the evidence must be considered in determining whether such…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Roberts v. William N. & Kate B. Reynolds Mem. ParkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. Wrenn v. Hillcrest Convalescent Home, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  3. McCombs v. City of AsheboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Wilson v. . DowtinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Sawyer v. ShacklefordCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Burns v. Forsyth County Hospital Authority, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Wiggins v. Pelikan, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
  3. Thornton v. F.J. Cherry HospitalCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  4. Leonard v. Lowe's Home Centers, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Feagin ex rel. Feagin v. StatonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API