Mayze v. Town of Forest City
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
Tbe defendants excepted to tbe finding by tbe Industrial Commission tbat plaintiff was an employee of tbe town of Forest City at tbe time be suffered an injury by accident, wbicb arose out of and in tbe course of bis employment, and contended tbat all tbe evidence showed tbat plaintiff was a relief worker, and not an employee of tbe town of Forest City at tbe time be was injured. Tbis exception was sustained by tbe judge of tbe Superior Court. In tbis there was error. There was evidence at least in support of tbe finding by tbe Industrial Commission, and for tbat reason tbe finding is…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bryson v. Gloucester Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Jackson v. North Carolina Emergency Relief AdministrationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
- Bell v. City of RaleighSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
3Cited by7 opinions
- Winslow v. . Carolina Conference AssociationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
- Olivieri v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Shelton v. City of GreenevilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1935
- Garney v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1935
- Bergstresser v. City of Willow LakeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.