Legal Opinion

Shelton v. City of Greeneville

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1935PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

This suit was brought by the plaintiff to recover under the Workmen’s Compensation Act (Code 1932, section 6851 et seq.) against the city of Grreeneville for injuries arising out of an accident which he contends occurred while he was in the employ of that city. The trial judge dismissed the suit, and the plaintiff has appealed.

Plaintiff was one of a number of men employed by the Emergency Belief Administration and put to work extending one of the streets in the city of Grreeneville. While engaged in that work, plaintiff received injuries which resulted in the loss of an eye. It is conceded…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
  2. City of Waycross v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Wardrep v. HoustonTennessee Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Mayze v. Town of Forest CitySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  5. Sanford v. KeefTennessee Supreme Court · 1918

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. City of Wichita Falls v. Travelers Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Owen v. St. Louis Spring Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. City of Waco v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  5. Dempster Mill Mfg. Co. v. LesterCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API