Garney v. Department of Labor & Industries
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.
On November 25, 1932, and for several days prior thereto, plaintiff was engaged in working or public roads in commissioner’s district No. 3, of Skagit county. He was hired by the commissioner who had charge of road work in that district, and was under the immediate direction of a foreman employed by the county. He was paid from moneys in the indigent relief fund, which had been augmented that year by the issuance by Skagit county of its general obligation bonds in the amount of one hundred thousand dollars. It seems that plaintiff was paid by some sort of a voucher, which was redeemable in…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Vaivida v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Supreme Court · 1933
- McBurney v. Indus. Accident Comm'nCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
- Forest Preserve District of Cook County v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1934
- Thurston Co. Chap. Amer. Etc. v. Dept. L. I.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
- Thurston County Chapter v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1932
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Olivieri v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1940
- Walter v. Everett School District No. 24Washington Supreme Court · 1938
- Reid v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
- Laws v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Blake v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1938
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.