Legal Opinion

Bryson v. Gloucester Lumber Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 17, 1933PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStacy, C. J.

The case turns on whether Lee M. Bryson was an independent contractor, or a servant or employee of the Gloucester Lumber Company at the time of his injury and death. The Industrial Commission found that he was an employee and awarded compensation, which finding, if supported by any competent evidence, is binding on the courts. Winberry v. Farley Stores, Inc., ante, 79; Webb v. Tomlinson, 202 N. C., 860, 164 S. E., 341.

The judge of the Superior Court, on the other hand, was of opinion that all the evidence tends to show the deceased was an independent contractor. With this view, we are…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Powell v. Construction Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Young v. Fosburg Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
  3. Denny v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
  4. Beal v. Champion Fiber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Harmon v. Ferguson Contracting Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hayes v. . Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  2. Hayes v. Board of Trustees of Elon CollegeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  3. Askew v. LEONARD TIRE COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  4. Richards v. Nationwide HomesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Hollowell v. North Carolina Department of Conservation & DevelopmentSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API