Legal Opinion

Thornton v. Federal Deposit Insurance

District Court, S.D. West Virginia

Decided January 6, 2004No. CIV.A. 1:00-0655, CIV.A. 1:03-2129PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FABER, Chief Judge.

By Order dated December 31, 2003, the court denied Grant Thornton’s Motion to Disqualify the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) Expert, Douglas Carmichael (doc. #25). The reasons for that decision follow.

Background

Mr. Carmichael was retained by the FDIC as an expert in this case in October 2001. See Grant Thornton’s Memorandum of Law in Support of its Motion to Disqualify, Ex. 5. Mr. Carmichael’s expert report was delivered to Grant Thornton on February 14, 2003, and his supplemental report was tendered to Grant Thornton on June 2, 2003. See…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Yu Jung Park v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  2. Margaret Scott v. Sears, Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1986
  3. Tessier v. Plastic Surgery Specialists, Inc.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  4. Wang Laboratories, Inc. v. Toshiba Corp.District Court, E.D. Virginia · 1991
  5. Palmer v. OzbekDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hewlett-Packard Co. v. EMC Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2004
  2. Rhodes v. EI DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND CO.District Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Billups v. ClawgesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Settle v. SteppDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API