Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Ozbek

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided August 25, 1992No. L-91-2030PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

LEGG, District Judge.

In this case the Court is called upon to decide the Plaintiffs’ Motion to Exclude Expert Witness Dr. McCay Vernon pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(4)(B). A number of papers have been submitted by the parties in reference to said motion.1 The Court has considered these papers and *67finds that there is no need for a hearing. See Local Rule 105.6 (D.Md.1989). Plaintiffs argue that Defendants cannot utilize Dr. Vernon as an expert because of a two-hour consultation between Dr. Vernon and two of Plaintiffs’ experts which took place in September 1991. For the reasons set…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Paul v. Rawlings Sporting Goods Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1988
  2. Conforti & Eisele, Inc. v. DIV. BLDG. & CONSTR.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  3. Great Lakes Dredge & Dock Co. v. Harnischfeger Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1990
  4. Riley v. Dow Chemical Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1989

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. John Hanlon and Ruth Ann Hanlon, Parents and Next Friends of Michael Hanlon v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
  2. English Feedlot, Inc. v. Norden Laboratories, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  3. Formosa Plastics Corp., USA v. Kajima International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2006
  4. United States Ex Rel. Cherry Hill Convalescent Center, Inc. v. Healthcare Rehab Systems, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. Cordy v. Sherwin-Williams Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API