Shaffer v. Arnaelsteen
California Court of Appeal
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtFinlayson, P. J.
This action for malicious prosecution is founded upon the allegation in the complaint that defendant maliciously and without probable cause had the plaintiff, Mrs. Shaffer, arrested and prosecuted for the embezzlement of $2.50. Following her acquittal of the embezzlement charge, Mrs. Shaffer and her husband brought this action against defendant to recover damages for the alleged malicious prosecution. The jury gave plaintiffs a verdict for $10,000. Defendant moved for a new trial on the ground, among others, of excessive damages, appearing to have been given under the influence of passion and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daves v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Davis v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
- Scrivani v. DonderoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Phelps v. CogswellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
- Russell v. DennisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1875
3Cited by8 opinions
- Singleton v. SingletonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- Livesey v. StockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Gackstetter v. Market Street Railway Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935
- Perry v. Washington National Insurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 1936
- Williams v. California Milk Producers Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.