Legal Opinion

Williams v. California Milk Producers Ass'n

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 5, 1934No. Docket No. 1459PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.

This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution. The defendant corporation was engaged in the business of retailing milk in the city of San Bernardino and defendant Schnepp was its route foreman. About four months prior to March 3, 1932, the plaintiff entered the milk business in San Bernardino and by personal solicitation obtained some one hundred and forty customers, taking from thirty per cent to forty per cent of them from the defendants. Shortly before 4 o’clock on the morning of March 3, 1932, plaintiff delivered a bottle of milk to one of his customers, picking up five empty…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. MooneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1908
  3. Shaffer v. ArnaelsteenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
  4. Wildenhayn v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. In Re GlavichCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Minasian v. SapseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  3. In Re RobertsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  4. Arnaudo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API