Legal Opinion

Livesey v. Stock

California Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1929No. Docket No. L.A. 10033PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPreston, J.

In this action the judgment was for plaintiff awarding actual and punitive damages growing out of an assault with a deadly weapon. The verdict was $5,000 actual and $50,000 exemplary damages. The court below, upon motion for a new trial, determined that unless the amount of such damages was remitted by the plaintiff to $750 as actual and $33,333.33 as punitive damages, a new trial should be ordered. Plaintiff remitted said excess sum, but the defendant has nevertheless appealed.

The first assignment of error requiring special consideration may be summed up in the words of defendant’s counsel…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Davis v. HearstCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bond v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Scott v. Times-Mirror Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. People v. McFarlaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Kiff v. . YoumansNew York Court of Appeals · 1881

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Northwestern National Casualty Company of Milwaukee, Wisconsin v. Edward A. McNulty and Walter Scott SmithCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  2. Finney v. LockhartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Bellman v. San Francisco High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Miller v. SchnitzerNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Zhadan v. Downtown L.A. MotorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API