Newton v. American Debt Services, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration came on before the Court on January 27, 2012. Docket Nos. 36, 39. For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendants’ motions to compel arbitration.
I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL HISTORY
In August 2009, Plaintiff Heather L. Newton responded to an advertisement by Defendant American Debt Services, Inc. (“ADS”), and spoke to a salesman who stated that ADS could settle her credit card debt for half of the balance owed. Docket No. 11 ¶¶31, 32 (“FAC”). While speaking to…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Doctor's Associates, Inc. v. CasarottoSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Chiron Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ortho Diagnostic Systems, Inc., a New Jersey CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Ruiz v. Moss Bros. Auto GroupCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Esquer v. Educ. Mgmt. Corp.District Court, S.D. California · 2017
- Lucas v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Trompeter v. Ally Financial, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Castillo v. Cleannet USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.