Legal Opinion
Lucas v. Hertz Corp.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 21, 2012No. C 11-01581 LBPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S SECOND MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION
LAUREL BEELER, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Kathleen Lucas and Dan Martin (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed the instant action against car rental company Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”) in San Francisco County Superior Court on November 29, 2010. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1 at 5-12 (“Complaint”).1 Hertz removed the action to this court on March 31, 2011. Notice of Removal, ECF No. 1. Hertz now moves, for the second time, for an order compelling Plaintiffs to arbitrate their claims pursuant to an arbitration agreement…
2Cases cited68 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Buckeye Check Cashing, Inc. v. CardegnaSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Deshaun Johnson v. TomoCredit, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2026
- Fong v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Fong v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Franklin v. Community Medical Centers, Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
- Kramer v. AvisDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.