Legal Opinion
Trompeter v. Ally Financial, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 1, 2012No. C 12-00392 CWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND MOTION FOR STAY (Docket Nos. 10 and 17)
CLAUDIA WILKEN, District Judge.
Plaintiff John Trompeter has filed a putative class action against Defendant Ally Financial, Inc., alleging that Ally had a policy and practice of secretly recording telephone calls with persons located in California without their consent. Trompeter alleges in his First Amended Complaint two causes of action under this state’s Invasion of Privacy Act, California Penal Code § 632, and the state Unfair Competition Law (UCL), California Business and Professions Code…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Nken v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Green Tree Financial Corp.-Alabama v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Berkson v. Gogo LLCDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2015
- Nanavati v. Adecco USA, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
- Lucas v. Hertz Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- Dalton v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2015
- Dalton v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2014
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.