Legal Opinion

Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Tulsa Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 6247PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from District Court, Tulsa County; L. M. Poe, Judge. Action by the Tulsa Vitrified Brick & Tile Company against the Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Company. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

It is claimed here that on April 30, 1910, at a certain point on Maybelle street in the city of Tulsa, the plaintiff in error was the owner of and had in its use and under its control a certain telephone wire, which was stretched upon its poles, and at the same place the Oklahoma Union Traction Company was the owner of and had in its use and under its control a trolly wire stretched upon its poles; that the wire of' the telephone company was not taut at said place, but was permitted to sag, which fact was known to both of said companies : that on said date the traction…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Giraude v. Elec. Improvement Co. of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  2. McLaughlin v. Louisville Electric Light Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  3. Denver Consolidated Electric Co. v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1895
  4. Shawnee Light & Power Co. v. SearsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
  5. Delahunt v. United Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Abraham v. GelwickSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. Freed Furniture Co. v. Criterion Advertising Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  3. Martinson v. HamilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1928
  4. Holmes v. EllisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API