Legal Opinion

Martinson v. Hamil

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided July 24, 1928No. 18310PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TEEHEE, C.

In this cause the parties appear here as they appeared in the trial court. Plaintiff sought judgment against defendant on two promissory notes aggregating $2,500, and for foreclosure of a mortgage lien on certain realty subject to a certain first mortgage. The petition contained the usual allegations in such cases. By appropriate pleadings, defendant answered that the notes sued on were given without consideration; that the notes and the mortgage given in security thereof were obtained as part consideration for the purchase of the property involved and were induced by false and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Werline v. AldredSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  2. Rogers v. BrummettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  3. Stevens v. ReillySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Hood v. WoodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  5. Byers v. BrisleySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1921

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Miller v. Troy Laundry MacHinery Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
  2. Johnson v. EagleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  3. B. v. Emery & Co. v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1934
  4. Steiner v. HughesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. G. A. Nichols, Inc. v. KarnesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API