Legal Opinion
Holmes v. Ellis
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 15, 1924No. 14586PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
FOSTER, C.
This was an ac-' tion in replevin commenced in the district court of Garvin county, Okla., by P. K. Holmes, plaintiff in error plaintiff below, against W. R. Ellis, defendant in error, defendant below, to recover the possession of two mules of the alleged value of $550. The parties will be hereinafter referred to as they appeared in the court below.
The plaintiff claimed a special ownership in said mules under and by virtue of the terms of a certain chattel mortgage which he alleged had been executed to him by one S. M. Russell on the 12th day of January, 1920, to secure…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. NewburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Empire Gas & Fuel Co. v. WainscottSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
- Kennedy v. GoodmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- W. T. Carter & Bro. v. Missouri Mining & Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
- Pioneer Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Tulsa Vitrified Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
3Cited by5 opinions
- Westgate Oil Co. v. McAbeeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- Westlake v. ColeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Covington State Bank v. JayneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Tull v. MilliganSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- Frank Harber Buick, Inc. v. MillerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958