Legal Opinion
Fiorentino v. A. E. Staley Manufacturing Co.
Massachusetts Appeals Court
Decided February 24, 1981PublishedCited by 34 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
On April 18, 1969, the plaintiffs, Antonio Fiorentino and Gino DeSimone, were seriously injured in an explosion which occurred while they were working with a product manufactured and sold by the defendant A.E. Staley Manufacturing Company (Staley) under the trade name of Bondrite Contact Cement CC-60 (Bondrite CC-60) . At the time of the accident, the plaintiffs were using the product to attach formica to a kitchen wall. They sought damages for negligence on the theory that Staley had failed to furnish adequate warnings of certain dangers inherent in the product’s use. A jury returned…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Williams v. Brown Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1970
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Raunela v. Hertz Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972
- Uloth v. City Tank Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by34 opinions
- Nesselrode v. Executive Beechcraft, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1986
- Colter v. Barber-Greene Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Barbosa v. HOPPER FEEDS. INC.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Jarrell v. Monsanto Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1988
- Cooley v. Carter-Wallace Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.