Legal Opinion
Jarrell v. Monsanto Co.
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided October 7, 1988No. 29A02-8610-CV-00354PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SULLIVAN, Judge.
Arthur Jarrell and his wife, Juliann, appeal the summary judgment granted to Monsanto Company in a products liability suit instituted to recover for injuries Arthur suffered in an industrial mishap.
We reverse.
Arthur is an employee of Firestone Industrial Products in Noblesville, Indiana. On October 19,1981, he was working in the Compound Department, filling bins with pigments used in the process of manufacturing rubber products. The pigment bins constituted a relatively new storage system at the Noblesville plant, and the day of the accident was only Arthur’s third working…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Berkebile v. Brantly Helicopter Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Technical Chemical Company v. JacobsTexas Supreme Court · 1972
- Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp. v. ChapmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
- Freund v. Cellofilm Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
- Greeno v. Clark Equipment CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 1965
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Sheila Ritchie v. Glidden Company, Ici Paints World-Group and Graco, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Natural Gas Odorizing, Inc. v. DownsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1997
- John W. WHITTED, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, and New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- Johnson v. Johnson Chemical Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- Montgomery Ward & Co. v. GreggIndiana Court of Appeals · 1990
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.