Legal Opinion
Barbosa v. HOPPER FEEDS. INC.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided April 18, 1989PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHennessey, C.J.
The three defendants appeal from judgments entered against them in this action for personal injury to Catherine Barbosa, and for loss of consortium by her husband and their three minor children. Catherine Barbosa’s injury occurred on January 16, 1981, while she was operating a machine for her employer, Armstrong World Industries, Inc. (Armstrong). The defendant Cincinnati Milacron, Inc. (CM), manufactured the machine in 1942. Armstrong purchased the machine in 1948, and subsequently added an automatic feeder manufactured by Hopper Feeds, Inc. (Hopper). The judgments entered against Hopper and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Peterson v. HopsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
- Ferriter v. Daniel O'Connell's Sons, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
- Poirier v. Town of PlymouthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Solimene v. B. GRAUEL & CO., KGMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1987
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Riley v. PresnellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
- Herbert A. Sullivan, Inc. v. Utica Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Kuwaiti Danish Computer Co. v. Digital Equipment Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2003
- Taylor v. American Chemistry CouncilCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Mathis v. Massachusetts Electric Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.