DoCanto v. Ametek, Inc.
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.
The defendant, a manufacturer of ironing machinery used in commercial laundries, argues various exceptions arising out of a trial which resulted in verdicts for the plaintiffs aggregating $467,000. 2
On July 16, 1968, Ezila C. doCanto (Ezila) was one of two operators of a “Troy Speedline 8 Roll Flat Work Ironer” at the Boston premises of Hospital Laundry Association, Inc. (Laundry). The defendant, Ametek, Inc. (Ametek), had sold the ironer to Laundry and installed it in the latter part of 1961. Ezila’s job was to put sheets into the ironer from one side, while another operator did so on the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bartley v. PhillipsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Liberatore v. Town of FraminghamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1944
- Carter v. Yardley & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Comstock v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
- Diaz v. Eli Lilly & Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1973
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by107 opinions
- Back v. Wickes Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Shaffer v. Honeywell, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Limone v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2009
- Corsetti v. Stone Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1985
- Labonte v. Hutchins & WheelerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997
102 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.